Don't mind this thread but I am stuck.
I'm writing a snarky critical response to a gallery review assuming that it's going to be published.
My paragraph is:
***Russell ___1___ states “to be presented with the idea [of what a piece of art in a gallery is trying to express] you have to read the curator’s explanation.” Now, the last time I checked, there was something called freedom in this city and I don’t remember this freedom being ___2____ in a gallery situation. The choice to look away from the textual explanations displayed by the institution is still valid (and quite effortless) unlike passing by a bloody scene of an accident on the 401.***
For WORD 1, I'd like an adverb that tells the reader that he made that statement without any objectivity. That what he thinks is fact is just his generalization.
And for WORD 2, I am stuck on a word that means "to block." Specifically, in regards to one's free-will or freedom.
I was thinking "hindered?" Or "stopped?" Confused a little.
I'm writing a snarky critical response to a gallery review assuming that it's going to be published.
My paragraph is:
***Russell ___1___ states “to be presented with the idea [of what a piece of art in a gallery is trying to express] you have to read the curator’s explanation.” Now, the last time I checked, there was something called freedom in this city and I don’t remember this freedom being ___2____ in a gallery situation. The choice to look away from the textual explanations displayed by the institution is still valid (and quite effortless) unlike passing by a bloody scene of an accident on the 401.***
For WORD 1, I'd like an adverb that tells the reader that he made that statement without any objectivity. That what he thinks is fact is just his generalization.
And for WORD 2, I am stuck on a word that means "to block." Specifically, in regards to one's free-will or freedom.
I was thinking "hindered?" Or "stopped?" Confused a little.
Last edited: