I hated that book.Originally posted by vox
okay...even if you take the person doug coupland out of the equation (if you even believe that (a) such an entity exists and (b) such a thing is possible), then even based on his writing style, i still find it gratingly vapid and empty, cultural studies 101 type stuff.
this dude in my class once did a musicological analysis of the song "girlfriend in a coma" against a reading of the text, and it was fucking brilliant...
Originally posted by oddmyth
I think Mofo's first choices were great! A Star Trek convention would be more appealing than discussion Gibson.
If you really wanted to pick something apart though, Coetzee or Nabokov would be great choices.
odbx
It doesn't suck. It's not the same as fight club. I still thought it was kind of blase. The ending wasn't super-shocking a la fight club.Originally posted by KickIT
I quickly lost interest in it because I just assumed it was using the same formula as Fight Club.
Originally posted by vox
or!!! JACK WOMACK. he's written "random acts of senseless violence"
Originally posted by Psyrel
^^ is that "the crimson petal and the white"?
Originally posted by vox
this dude in my class once did a musicological analysis of the song "girlfriend in a coma" against a reading of the text, and it was fucking brilliant...
Originally posted by Hal-9000
You'll never get everyone to read 'Underworld'.
They should, but they won't. I've lent that book to so many people, maybe one or two actually finished it. I considered ending friendships because of it.
Originally posted by Hal-9000
You'll never get everyone to read 'Underworld'.
They should, but they won't. I've lent that book to so many people, maybe one or two actually finished it. I considered ending friendships because of it.