Surely thats a joke?Originally posted by zoo
^^ Yeah with harddisk storage sizes skyrocketing, marginally compressed codecs like this one are feasible on a large scale.
The only question is, is there enough of a difference between this and a LAME alt-preset-extreme MP3 that makes the extra space justified?
I don't think it's possible to tell the difference that that level of MP3 quality ... it's practically lossless.
Originally posted by Isosceles_CAT
I would have to agree... Even at 256 the differences in the high end are noticable on an affordably high end system... Even to me and this old dogs ears are worn right out.