Bacchus, let me be real honest with you here for a moment.
Congrats on winning absolutely nothing other than the ability to say "I was right". There is not a chance you will see a dime from this person aside from the rent he retained from you, if you think any court has the ability to enforce the requirement to pay you really need to get better legal advice. Good luck in small claims court' it'll be a total waste of time for you, unless you're looking for a judge to say you were right but I doubt even the judge will be able to enforce any sort of payment.
Just read this cover to cover. WOOSHHHH!!! I have to say, I sorta feel bad for all involved.
Wife is stressed and pregnant...cant be a good combo
You now need to find a new place which is stressful and annoying
Landlord is screwed and now receiving court orders to pay fines.
Seems like a lose lose lose to me.
Either way, glad to hear this is almost over and you guys can move on and start that family in a home you feel comfortable in.
Good luck apt hunting!
Just read this cover to cover. WOOSHHHH!!! I have to say, I sorta feel bad for all involved.
Wife is stressed and pregnant...cant be a good combo
You now need to find a new place which is stressful and annoying
Landlord is screwed and now receiving court orders to pay fines.
Seems like a lose lose lose to me.
Either way, glad to hear this is almost over and you guys can move on and start that family in a home you feel comfortable in.
Good luck apt hunting!
Without commenting on anything else in this thread, I thought I would talk to the small claims court aspect.
Collecting from a small claims court decision can be quite difficult but it is possible. We won a decision against a contractor and followed the process that eventually allowed for the garnishing of thier bank account. It is quite labour intensive and in our case we had a cancelled cheque with account information to work with.
It is true that a decision in your favour does not guarnatee payment.
We're talking about a landlord. That means he owns at least one identifiable, non-removable piece of high value property. He's highly unlikely to just abscond into the aether because of that. Sure, maybe that's all the money he has/maybe he'll flash-sell it and sail away, but we all know that isn't going to happen.
We're talking about a landlord. That means he owns at least one identifiable, non-removable piece of high value property. He's highly unlikely to just abscond into the aether because of that. Sure, maybe that's all the money he has/maybe he'll flash-sell it and sail away, but we all know that isn't going to happen.
of course, I know all that and plan to follow the rules. I guess I'm more worried about tenants feeling OK to lie on an application or be sneaky/twisty with their disclosure of info (employment issues, number of people they plan on living with, smoking/non smoking etc)
and my bigger point is that I don't think the pregnancy should have been used as a sympathy chip in this issue
haha - spinsah beat me to it!
...great minds, eh?
I think the pregnancy is irrelevant to the landlord/tenant discussion, but as for the concerns you outlined (other than the vague 'employment issues') as a landlord you'd have legal recourse if they were violated.of course, I know all that and plan to follow the rules. I guess I'm more worried about tenants feeling OK to lie on an application or be sneaky/twisty with their disclosure of info (employment issues, number of people they plan on living with, smoking/non smoking etc)
and my bigger point is that I don't think the pregnancy should have been used as a sympathy chip in this issue
Gotta say after reading this, you know people are just out for blood now. So Bacchus does something a lot disagree with. Now people are questioning if your wife is going to get EI because, you know, if you had just a minor hole in your story, they would jump all over you. Sigh, the internets...
I'm glad to hear this is almost over for you.
Pregnancy was only used as a sympathy chip AFTER the landlord chose to refuse us entry into a home we had leased.
And again, if we had a landlord who didn't have contempt for the law, we wouldn't have had to lie.
I wasn't questioning anything at all regarding EI. Bacchus noted she started a new job and was wondering if she could get EI as there are a minimum number of hours needed to qualify. Just a simple question. No need to over think.
You as a person have lost any street cred you may have had .
So now you're saying that you knew he was going to not rent to you prior to getting the place? Ill assume because you had a dog.
So the reality is he didn't have contempt for the law which in turn caused you to lie, rather your lie was premeditated.
Precursor: These are not "witch hunt questions"
Just curious, if he demonstrated such contempt for the law at the onset - why bother following through with a landlord relationship with him? Imagine what kind of prick he'd be about other house matters. Why not walk on to another better place with a lawful landlord?
You've mentioned it was an overpriced house - why did you want it so badly? Why not buy a house rather then renting?
Last question, was your case a precedent case? Or, has the tribunal ruled in the favor of other cases similar to yours? I have no time to research this, which is why I ask.
who pays for the tribunal & hearings and all that horse shit?