<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by mutslaster:
last night on Survivor:
"bittersweet"
they should just change the name of the show to bittersweet.</font>
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by KiFe:
hey are you like NEVER on icq anymore?
skiing cancelled... film at eleven</font>
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Cheap Ego:
I will be back on at 9:30... film at.. uh 9:30</font>
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Vidman:
[Probably blend of irrespective, and regardless.]
Usage Note: Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir- prefix and -less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so. </font>
haha...<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Jazz:
xylophone</font>
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by djcheezwhiz:
bling bling</font>
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Aphrodite:
word
werd
(IT'S SO DAMN LAME)</font>
tis a grand word...<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Nesta:
What the fuck does "bling bling" mean anyway?
I love it.![]()
</font>
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by PinkAngeL:
irregardless
especially since it isn't even a word!!!!
It is supposed to just be regardless.</font>