• Hi Guest: Welcome to TRIBE, the online home of TRIBE MAGAZINE. If you'd like to post here, or reply to existing posts on TRIBE, you first have to register. Join us!

Oh farewell, middle lane on Jarvis...

Bumbaclat

TRIBE Member
these are the same people who refuse to have their streets updated in an effort to keep regular people from using their fancy fancy neighborhood roads as through-fares?

1. You're confused, that urban myth is about the Bridle Path, not Rosedale. Have you driven there recently? The roads are/always have been fine.

2. The city decides when roads get updated. Private citizens do not have the the right to "refuse" maintenance.

3. A road would have to be almost destroyed before people would stop using it as a convenient route through the city.
 

Zorro

TRIBE Member
Well I am not a "cyclist" but do ride my bike often through the city.
I also live at the bottom of Jarvis and see everyday and worse on Fridays how traffic works/backups. Also with the Red light camera people still run the light at will.

All that being said I'm all for the Bike lanes on Jarvis.
Stating that yes there is a bike lane on Sherbourne, and no it's not enjoyable to share or get behind one of our wonderful buses that frequent a pretty horrible road in of itself.
 
Subscribe to Cannabis Goldsmith, wherever you get your podcasts

lucky1

TRIBE Member
1. You're confused, that urban myth is about the Bridle Path, not Rosedale. Have you driven there recently? The roads are/always have been fine.

2. The city decides when roads get updated. Private citizens do not have the the right to "refuse" maintenance.

3. A road would have to be almost destroyed before people would stop using it as a convenient route through the city.


re: Bridle path. I had heard of this neighbourhood, but didn't know where it was. We decided to drive to Scarborough down Lawrence avenue from Jane Street and not take the 401. We're just past Yonge when the main street kind of disapeard, the road got all bumpy and crappy and the houses got huge. Hello bridle path. Crappy streets, huge houses. ;)
 

Bumbaclat

TRIBE Member
People over 30 can't walk?

Of all the moronic things you've ever posted, that is possibly the most idiotic.

Kudos for raising a bar I always considered to high to possibly breach.

Hi troll! Did I say that people over 30 can't walk? Hawk Eye was complaining about people not walking. Hawk Eye is in her 20's. I was pointing out that not everybody approaches transportation from her perspective. make sense?
 

rod_g

TRIBE Member
What happened to all the Jarvis hookers gathered on street corners. I distinctly remember the crowds in the mid 90's
 
Subscribe to Cannabis Goldsmith, wherever you get your podcasts

The Watcher

TRIBE Member
People over 30 can't walk?

Of all the moronic things you've ever posted, that is possibly the most idiotic.

Kudos for raising a bar I always considered to high to possibly breach.

You're a useless piece of shit, your contributions to this board are nothing but inflammatory and everyone should just ignore your existence online and in real life.

Congratz on your accomplishments troll

And I'm sure you're going to have a witty retort for this, I'm already applauding your attempt.
 

khemistry

TRIBE Member
I ride my bike everyday to work starting spring.

A new bike lanes is good for cyclist, however putting a bike lane on Jarvis is not necessary, I'd rather see them on Queen St or King Street, Bloor lanes. Is this a REAL bike lanes or the fake ones all over the city that cars can cut into?
 

Flashy_McFlash

Well-Known TRIBEr
IMG_0199-bike-lane_1.jpg


I assume by 'real' you mean separated lanes like this? I doubt they'd put that in.
 
Subscribe to Cannabis Goldsmith, wherever you get your podcasts

rentboy

TRIBE Member
While I don't commute on a bike, I do cycle pretty often in the summer and there's loads of alternate routes (not just Sherbourne) that are better than Jarvis for riding.

I just think that making Jarvis into less of an artery will just push that traffic onto other routes, while not providing that much to cyclists. Sure, bike lanes may convince cyclists to use Jarvis more, but that's not good enough justification for this project IMO. Especially when there's so many other bike-related initiatives that people actually want and have asked for.

personally, i'd prefer to see a bike lane on either Bathurst or Spadina (not really possible due to the gridlock there)...
 

d.code

TRIBE Member
i always thought they should make a bike path along the tracks from Front / Bathurst out to the west end.
 

Hawk Eye

TRIBE Member
Not everybody is in their 20's.

They're not elderly or disabled people. They're able bodied.

I want to commute to work except riding a bike north or south is hard for me as I have to hit up all the major streets. Mt. Pleasant is ridiculous. I'm a timid bike rider anyways as I don't bike often in the city. Cars speed on Mt. Pleasant and there are all these pot holes on the side of the road so you are trying to avoid them.. I think there needs to be more north/south bike lanes. So far i've only seen east/west.
 

erika

TRIBE Member
these are the same people who refuse to have their streets updated in an effort to keep regular people from using their fancy fancy neighborhood roads as through-fares?

personally I think it's important to have bike lanes on all major routs in toronto. It's always going to be slow driving in a big city, if you insisit on doing it then take what you get, but the idea of denying a place where people can ride their bikes safely so you can have the potential of being marginally less "jammed" is infuriatingly stupid.

Agree 100%; there is no reason to keep the downtown "car friendly" to that degree. Jarvis could have potential as a "grande avenue" but it needs to get much more pedestrian-friendly for that.
 
Subscribe to Cannabis Goldsmith, wherever you get your podcasts

Flashy_McFlash

Well-Known TRIBEr
Agree 100%; there is no reason to keep the downtown "car friendly" to that degree. Jarvis could have potential as a "grande avenue" but it needs to get much more pedestrian-friendly for that.

There still needs to be major arteries for cars going north and south (unless you want delivery trucks and other large vehicles on smaller streets), and I am extremely skeptical that this project is going to be the revitalization of Jarvis that it's being sold as. Other than hookers, there's really nothing on Jarvis that inspires people to walk and browse unless you're looking for drugs, and removing a lane isn't going to change that.
 

KodiaK

TRIBE Member
man WTF.

that middle lane is a pure GODSEND in driving around downtown.

god this city is so fucking retarded. Kinda like how they got rid of the left turn lanes on wellesly at church, and made a bike lane... yea.. that REALLY 'improved' things in that area at least.... :rolleyes:

so now the only two true thoroughfares through downtown... are richmond and adelaide.

way to go hippies. You got your fucking bike lanes. Grats. :mad:
 

acheron

TRIBE Member
Jarvis needs more than hookers and the Keg to turn it into a grand avenue. Fuck it's like 9/10ths residential anyway
 

derek

TRIBE Member
There still needs to be major arteries for cars going north and south (unless you want delivery trucks and other large vehicles on smaller streets), and I am extremely skeptical that this project is going to be the revitalization of Jarvis that it's being sold as. Other than hookers, there's really nothing on Jarvis that inspires people to walk and browse unless you're looking for drugs, and removing a lane isn't going to change that.


yeah but now tron only needs to be worried about being clipped by a bike rather than a car when dealing at jarvis & gerrard.

chappelleova-prehlidka-6.jpg
 
Subscribe to Cannabis Goldsmith, wherever you get your podcasts
Top