these are the same people who refuse to have their streets updated in an effort to keep regular people from using their fancy fancy neighborhood roads as through-fares?
People are lazy fucks. There is a bus stop outside my apartment that is ohhh i dont know, a whole 7-10 minute walk to the subway!! There is always a line up of ppl waiting for the bus.
i_brad has had a semi all morning after reading this.
Not everybody is in their 20's.
1. You're confused, that urban myth is about the Bridle Path, not Rosedale. Have you driven there recently? The roads are/always have been fine.
2. The city decides when roads get updated. Private citizens do not have the the right to "refuse" maintenance.
3. A road would have to be almost destroyed before people would stop using it as a convenient route through the city.
People over 30 can't walk?
Of all the moronic things you've ever posted, that is possibly the most idiotic.
Kudos for raising a bar I always considered to high to possibly breach.
People over 30 can't walk?
Of all the moronic things you've ever posted, that is possibly the most idiotic.
Kudos for raising a bar I always considered to high to possibly breach.
People over 30 can't walk?
Of all the moronic things you've ever posted, that is possibly the most idiotic.
Kudos for raising a bar I always considered to high to possibly breach.
That lane is really hard to drive on when you're high as fuck.
While I don't commute on a bike, I do cycle pretty often in the summer and there's loads of alternate routes (not just Sherbourne) that are better than Jarvis for riding.
I just think that making Jarvis into less of an artery will just push that traffic onto other routes, while not providing that much to cyclists. Sure, bike lanes may convince cyclists to use Jarvis more, but that's not good enough justification for this project IMO. Especially when there's so many other bike-related initiatives that people actually want and have asked for.
Not everybody is in their 20's.
these are the same people who refuse to have their streets updated in an effort to keep regular people from using their fancy fancy neighborhood roads as through-fares?
personally I think it's important to have bike lanes on all major routs in toronto. It's always going to be slow driving in a big city, if you insisit on doing it then take what you get, but the idea of denying a place where people can ride their bikes safely so you can have the potential of being marginally less "jammed" is infuriatingly stupid.
Agree 100%; there is no reason to keep the downtown "car friendly" to that degree. Jarvis could have potential as a "grande avenue" but it needs to get much more pedestrian-friendly for that.
There still needs to be major arteries for cars going north and south (unless you want delivery trucks and other large vehicles on smaller streets), and I am extremely skeptical that this project is going to be the revitalization of Jarvis that it's being sold as. Other than hookers, there's really nothing on Jarvis that inspires people to walk and browse unless you're looking for drugs, and removing a lane isn't going to change that.