this plane doesn't get ' shot down ' 17 years to the day of it's first flight by chance...not after another goes missing, and still hasn't been found. not when Freescale's involved with new tech that fucks with radar. not when even the Malaysian PM has links to Rothchilds.
There have been quite a number of "conspiracy theories" that have become "conspiracy fact". Those who pay attention to history are those you find most open to the possibilities, which explains why some people don't necessarily believe nor dis-believe the narrative that this is Putin's fault, the Ukrainians themselves could have done it, or one of the other theories going around.
After all, when Britain was found to lie about the presence of munitions on a civilian passenger liner Lusitania whose sinking was the cause for US to enter World War 1, well, it begs the question what else are "civilized" Western governments capable of?
Secret of the Lusitania: Arms find challenges Allied claims it was solely a passenger ship | Mail Online
Lots of stuff to pick from in "real conspiracy" - Libor comes to mind for a recent financial one. Looks like pretty solid evidence the KGB was manufacturing chechen attacks in Moscow.
The list goes on.
And this latest airliner thing is fertile ground for speculation - I'm not without a little bit of genuine interest in these ideas, hence the posting of the rebel claim regarding the plane being filled with already dead bodies! That said, don't mistake disbelief in some conspiracies for a disbelief in all of them. The human condition is nothing if not messy and full of assholes.
sure, occasionally conspiracies are true. however, the vast majority of the time they're not. also, the ones that end up being true are actually plausible, no bat shit crazy theories ever get proven.
the thing that always pissed me off about 911 truthers is they missed the real conspiracy of Cheney & the CIA making up the weapons of mass destruction intelligence. that was the real conspiracy that killed thousands and cost trillions, yet has never been properly investigated.
the difference between those conspiracies is one was plausible because it required a limited amount of participants easily making up an intangible thing like "intelligence" vs the other which would require untold logistics and a large network to execute which could never keep the details secret.
so yes, is it possible that Ukraine shot the plane down? sure. is it likely? no. most of the time the obvious solution is the right one.