• Hi Guest: Welcome to TRIBE, the online home of TRIBE MAGAZINE. If you'd like to post here, or reply to existing posts on TRIBE, you first have to register. Join us!

FBI says, “No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11”

solgrabber

TRIBE Member
June 6, 2006 – This past weekend, a thought provoking e-mail circulated through Internet news groups, bringing attention to the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorist web page for Usama Bin Laden. In the e-mail, the question is asked, “Why doesn’t Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster make any direct connection with the events of September 11, 2001?” The FBI says on its Bin Laden web page that Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998 bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. According to the FBI, these attacks killed over 200 people. The FBI concludes its reason for “wanting” Bin Laden by saying, “In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorists attacks throughout the world.”

On June 5, 2006, the Muckraker Report contacted the FBI Headquarters, (202) 324-3000, to learn why Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection with 9/11. The Muckraker Report spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Tomb said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”

Surprised by the ease in which this FBI spokesman made such an astonishing statement, I asked, “How this was possible?” Tomb continued, “Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11.” I asked, “How does that work?” Tomb continued, “The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice than decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, Bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connected Bin Laden to 9/11.”

It shouldn’t take long before the full meaning of these FBI statements start to prick your brain and raise your blood pressure. If you think the way I think, in quick order you will be wrestling with a barrage of very powerful questions that must be answered. First and foremost, if the U.S. government does not have enough hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11, how is it possible that it had enough evidence to invade Afghanistan to “smoke him out of his cave?” The federal government claims to have invaded Afghanistan to “root out” Bin Laden and the Taliban. Through the talking heads in the mainstream media, the Bush Administration told the American people that Usama Bin Laden was Public Enemy Number One and responsible for the deaths of nearly 3000 people on September 11, 2001. Yet nearly five years later, the FBI says that it has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.

Next is the Bin Laden “confession” video that was released by the U.S. government on December 13, 2001. Most Americans remember this video. It was the video showing Bin Laden with a few of his comrades recounting with delight the September 11 terrorist attacks against the United States. The Department of Defense issued a press release to accompany this video in which Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld said, “There was no doubt of bin Laden’s responsibility for the September 11 attacks before the tape was discovered.”[2] What Rumsfeld implied by his statement was that Bin Laden was the known mastermind behind 9/11 even before the “confession video” and that the video simply served to confirm what the U.S. government already knew; that Bin Laden was responsible for the 9/11 attacks.

In a BBC News article[3] reporting on the “9/11 confession video” release, President Bush is said to have been hesitate to release the tape because he knew it would be a vivid reminder to many people of their loss. But, he also knew it would be “a devastating declaration” of Bin Laden’s guilt. “Were going to get him,” said President Bush. “Dead or alive, it doesn’t matter to me.”

In a CNN article[4] regarding the Bin Laden tape, then New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani said that “the tape removes any doubt that the U.S. military campaign targeting bin Laden and his associates is more than justified.” Senator Richard Shelby, R-Alabama, the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee said, “The tape’s release is central to informing people in the outside world who don’t believe bin Laden was involved in the September 11 attacks.” Shelby went on to say “I don’t know how they can be in denial after they see this tape.” Well Senator Shelby, apparently the Federal Bureau of Investigation isn’t convinced by the taped confession, so why are you?

The Muckraker Report attempted to secure a reference to the U.S. government authenticating the Bin Laden “confession video”, to no avail. However, it is conclusive that the Bush Administration and U.S. Congress, along with the dead stream media, played the video as if it was authentic. So why doesn’t the FBI view the “confession video” as hard evidence? After all, if the FBI is investigating a crime such as drug trafficking, and it discovers a video of members of a drug cartel opening talking about a successful distribution operation in the United States, that video would be presented to a federal grand jury. The identified participants of the video would be indicted, and if captured, the video alone would serve as sufficient evidence to net a conviction in a federal court. So why is the Bin Laden “confession video” not carrying the same weight with the FBI? ....

full report

http://www.teamliberty.net/id267.html
 
Cannabis Seed Wedding Bands

Shug

TRIBE Member
At first, Bin Laden publically denied it profusely... its conceivable that once all international eyes were on him, he took credit so as to garner support, financial and otherwise, from extreme Islamics as a legitimate and strong terrorist force against the West.
 

solgrabber

TRIBE Member
Except of course, his saying that he was behind it.

Source?

Did you even read the article? You do realize you can go to the FBI's site and check for yourself that Bin Laden is not wanted by them for the attacks of 9/11. They have no hard evidence against him, the FBI does not even take the confession tape of Bin Laden seriously. (it's a fake video)

This should be on the headlines the world over but as always the mass media seem more interested in showing more important issues. :rolleyes:
 
tribe cannabis accessories silver grinders

Boss Hog

TRIBE Member
solgrabber said:
Source?

Did you even read the article? You do realize you can go to the FBI's site and check for yourself that Bin Laden is not wanted by them for the attacks of 9/11. They have no hard evidence against him, the FBI does not even take the confession tape of Bin Laden seriously. (it's a fake video)

This should be on the headlines the world over but as always the mass media seem more interested in showing more important issues. :rolleyes:

You know know you have a really bad habit of being presumptuous and condescending in your posts? I'd say the reason you're not well liked is more attributed to that rather than the fact that you're more obsessed with 9/11 than anyone I've ever met (and I've worked with the biggest 9/11 heads on the continent).

Yes I read your post. And the fact that you even know what video I'm talking about shows me you don't need a "source".

You're a joke.
 

solgrabber

TRIBE Member
Hal-9000 said:

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osamatape.html

Take a look and honestly decide for yourself if the man in the video that the Bush regime used over and over again looks anything like that of the real Bin Laden.

It's far easier to simply shout "HE DID IT!" enough times so the general public believe you. Courts mean nothing these days. Public opinion is far stronger than what any judge or grand jury says.
 

solgrabber

TRIBE Member
You know know you have a really bad habit of being presumptuous and condescending in your posts? I'd say the reason you're not well liked is more attributed to that rather than the fact that you're more obsessed with 9/11 than anyone I've ever met (and I've worked with the biggest 9/11 heads on the continent).

Yes I read your post. And the fact that you even know what video I'm talking about shows me you don't need a "source".

You're a joke.

No the fact that a FBI official just came out and made these statements is what you should be paying attention to. Why is the FBI covering their own backs all of a sudden?

Judge the content, joker.
 
tribe cannabis accessories silver grinders

SellyCat

TRIBE Member
solgrabber said:
This should be on the headlines the world over but as always the mass media seem more interested in showing more important issues. :rolleyes:

EXACTLY! They SHOULD be more interested in showing MORE IMPORTANT ISSUES.

The truth finally comes barelling out of this asshole.

Oh man, that was amazing. He actually admits this story is such bullshit and admits that the mass media is doing its job by showing "more important issues" instead.

That's just too perfect!
 
Last edited:

solgrabber

TRIBE Member
Continue being ignorant if this is what you please. You do realize you can call up the FBI and they will tell you the exact same thing, visit their website too. No Hard Evidence what so ever linking him to 9/11!

What a thought!
 

solgrabber

TRIBE Member
Maybe you guys believe this document is faked also?

http://img123.imageshack.us/my.php?image=191eye5dn.gif

It clearly shows that the trail to Bin Laden was cut off from Sept.11.1996 and started up again on Sept.11.2001 exactly 5 years. Why would Bush cut off all leads to Bin Laden prioir to 9/11 and suddenly bring him into the light again?

Bush could not have been setting Bin Laden up, that's impossible! :rolleyes:
 

Boss Hog

TRIBE Member
solgrabber said:
It clearly shows that the trail to Bin Laden was cut off from Sept.11.1996 and started up again on Sept.11.2001 exactly 5 years. Why would Bush cut off all leads to Bin Laden prioir to 9/11 and suddenly bring him into the light again?

Bush could not have been setting Bin Laden up, that's impossible! :rolleyes:

Bush came into power in 2000, so I don't think he cut off all leads after 1996. That's impossible!
 

solgrabber

TRIBE Member
Shows how much you read the information I posted. :rolleyes:

Clinton constrained the investigations into the Saudis. Bush killed them down right unitl 9/11 that is.

Try again.
 
tribe cannabis accessories silver grinders

Boss Hog

TRIBE Member
You know that using a roll-eyes emoticon doesn't make your argument any more valid, right?

So basically you're backpedaling now and saying that Clinton was the conspirator until 2000 when Bush took over the job, doing his part up until 9/11.

If that's not what you're saying, clarify.
 

solgrabber

TRIBE Member
binladen8.jpg


Figure E shows the character in the video that was played over and again in the media.

Anyone here notice something wrong? Who does not belong in the picture above?
 

SellyCat

TRIBE Member
solgrabber said:
This should be on the headlines the world over but as always the mass media seem more interested in showing more important issues. :rolleyes:

I couldn't agree with you more! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

solgrabber

TRIBE Member
Boss Hog read the document already. It's not me saying it! This is a classified document that clearly states what I am passing on. Pull your head out of the sand for a second.
 
tribe cannabis accessories silver grinders

Boss Hog

TRIBE Member
Okay, my "head is out of the sand" and doesn't see Clinton mentioned in that article.

(do you get royalties from those cliches?)
 

Boss Hog

TRIBE Member
solgrabber said:
Ever heard of John O'Neill? (former FBI and leading expert on AL Qeada for 6 years)


Yes, so?

No YOU inform us. You're the one making "points" and trying to get our heads out of the sand. So if you want to draw conclusions from all the positive "proof" you have, present it.

Right now you're not even providing sufficient reading material to back up your points, let alone evidence.
 
tribe cannabis accessories silver grinders
Top