You still haven't specified the start date and end date of your article counts, without which the counts are rather useless.so go to at least huffpost usa and count your self if you do not believe in my count since you believe that my counting is biased since I want the number to re-enforce my belief.
do you want me to take a screen shot and count together or you will accuse me of editing the screenshot to fake the results.
And even if true, set against the entire campaign Trump still has the edge, according to that graph above - if anything Hillary was catching up to him (getting more coverage than him) on the back of the DNC and likely some more of the email stuff hitting lately too.
So a recent count showing more Trump than Hillary articles:
A) might be a reversion back to the trend where Trump got more free coverage than her
B) might be because of actual things driving that coverage as his tweets and campaign team have stoked more coverage from recent shit they did.
And it may be that more Trump coverage is actually a pro-Trump thing, if you think of it as being free publicity for his campaign, of which he has got much more free coverage than Hillary.
IN fact someone could look at article counts and make the opposite case of CJWs asserting media bias against conservatives in their Imagined Victimhood and Victim Culture - couldn't one argue that Trump getting so much more free media coverage than her for this long is evidence of anti-Hillary bias and pro-Trump bias in the media?