TRIBE - tribe.ca
Home Albums Advertise TRIBE logos Subscribe to TRIBE feed About

Go Back   TRIBE - tribe.ca > TRIBE BOARD > TRIBE Main Forum

Hey Mel!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-09-2003, 11:04 AM   #1
TRIBE Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: I don't hate anyone.
Posts: 36,116
Hey Mel!

Study: Smoking pot damages lungs

Cannabis robs the body of cell-protecting antioxidants

Smoking cannabis is not the harmless recreational activity it may seem because it can cause lung damage, researchers said on Friday.

REGULARLY SMOKING three or four joints a week, even for less than six years, can impair lung function and rob the body of antioxidants that protect cells against damage that can lead to heart disease and cancer.
“Smoking cannabis on a regular basis actually depletes your lung of protective antioxidant substances...and this may have chronic long-term implications for young individuals,” said Dr Sarah Nuttall of the University of Birmingham in central England.
In a small study involving 20 people aged 19 to 30, including non-smokers and those who smoked tobacco and cannabis, Nuttall and her team took blood samples, measured lung function and tested for antioxidant markers. She presented the finding at a meeting of the British Thoracic Society in London.
“We found that smokers, compared to non-smokers, had impaired lung function,” Nuttall said in an interview.
Cannabis smokers also had significantly lower levels of a protective antioxidant and nitric oxide, which is involved in lung function, than non-smokers.
“These findings are important in young individuals in which the use of cannabis is increasing and may have serious long-term implications for what is currently regarded as a relatively harmless recreational habit,” she said.
Dr John Harvey, of the British Thoracic Society, called for more research into the effects of smoking on the lungs.

“It is vital that young people understand the dangers of both cigarette and cannabis smoking since these habits can start having a serious impact on their lungs at an early stage,” he said in a statement.
Some European countries have taken a relaxed approach to cannabis use. Although it is technically illegal in the Netherlands, the drug can be bought and used in cannabis coffee shops in the country.
The Netherlands was also the first nation to make cannabis available as a prescription drug in pharmacies for chronically ill patients.
kuba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2003, 11:08 AM   #2
TRIBE Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hiding under Fraggle Rock during this Apocalypse
Posts: 28,077
Wait... so does this mean doing drugs....even pot,.... is bad for me?!

NO WAY!

I never would of thought.

That's it... no more pot. I'm sticking to Crack
The Watcher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2003, 11:10 AM   #3
TRIBE Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Brockway, Audbinville, and North Haverbrooke!
Posts: 13,199
How is that any diffrent then smoking tabbacco?
At least weed wont give you cancer... will it? :|
Hi i'm God is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2003, 11:12 AM   #4
TRIBE Promoter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: yes thats right, ALL the tea in China
Posts: 5,744
everything is bad for you if you use it too much.
finary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2003, 11:13 AM   #5
TRIBE Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: hey everybody, this food is hot
Posts: 34,227
tribe is boring today.
mingster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2003, 11:24 AM   #6
TRIBE Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Mount Lushmore
Posts: 13,479
I think there is a serious problem with acceptance of scientific studies today. We've heard stories how the governement used to make claims that weed would make your weiner shrink, and have seen major ecstasy findings completely discredited based on poor science. Why would I believe this guy when there is a history of crap being thrown at us?
defazman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2003, 11:24 AM   #7
TRIBE Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Mount Lushmore
Posts: 13,479
and boring is in the eye of the poster
defazman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2003, 11:26 AM   #8
TRIBE Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: I don't hate anyone.
Posts: 36,116
Quote:
Originally posted by mingster
tribe is boring today.
either way, I hope now you know.

not that I believe everything I read.
kuba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2003, 11:32 AM   #9
TRIBE Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: hey everybody, this food is hot
Posts: 34,227
Quote:
Originally posted by qtip
either way, I hope now you know.

not that I believe everything I read.
well, i think every bit of information is good to read. but studies like this are rarely the final word.


i don't doubt that there will be some effect on my lungs. i notice it when i exercise shortly after smoking weed. but as an ex-smoker, i can tell you that the damage, or physical drawback is a fraction of what it was when i was a smoker. with cigarettes, i felt like i was damaging my body, and counteracting my workout. but with weed, i really don't feel that effect on my body. i feel like i can have just as healthy a body and heart as if i didn't smoke anything.

i can do hard workouts, i can run for extended periods of time, all since i've quit smoking. and i haven't cut back on the weed. maybe it's possible that if i stopped smoking weed, it would be even better. but i have no complaints right now.


anyways, as for our original argument, i still don't think that smoking a joint after the workout is anymore damaging than smoking it at any other time.
mingster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2003, 11:33 AM   #10
TRIBE Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: I don't hate anyone.
Posts: 36,116
Quote:
Originally posted by mingster



what was our original argument?
we didnt have one. i just didnt have any studies to prove it, and now I do, but you gotta wonder about the source.

anyways, carry on!
kuba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2003, 11:34 AM   #11
TRIBE Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,883
This study doesn't present it's results very well, or if they did, the media seems to be messing them up.

Based on what I've read, I would question the results.

How did they define non-smoker? And were all the pot smokers, cigarette smokers as well?

This study is useless, just some fear mongering by some anti pot people. A study of 20 people? Means nothing.
Vote Quimby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2003, 11:35 AM   #12
TRIBE Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: I'm down with the Dorito
Posts: 36,248
I'll still smoke weed.
IgStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2003, 11:35 AM   #13
TRIBE Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: hey everybody, this food is hot
Posts: 34,227
Quote:
Originally posted by qtip
we didnt have one.
yeah, we were talking about whether or not smoking a joint after a workout would counter act it, or void it somehow.
mingster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2003, 11:35 AM   #14
TRIBE Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: the barn I was raised in
Posts: 13,754
Quote:
Originally posted by finary
everything is bad for you if you use it too much.
even Bumbaclat Junior?
Bumbaclat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:00 PM.


Design By: Miner Skinz.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0

Who owns what on TRIBE® | Your privacy on our sites | TRIBE® Policy Statements | ehMac.ca: Canada's Mac Community!
healthcast.ca : Canadian Health News + Information | nichecast.ca : Advertising Blog

The TRIBE® servers are co-located at beanfield


© 1993 - 2011 Alex Dordevic